Tinder and Valentine's Day respectively are among the most divisive concepts of millennial dating. Everyone knows a guy or six that loves to lambast Valentine's Day as a commercial ploy, while others take to social media to prove they are loved by someone other than themselves. Meanwhile, Tinder has spurned many a think piece about hook-up culture and its irrevocable destruction of romance. Subsequently, the notion of meeting up with Tinder match after Tinder match on the most amorous day of the year seemed almost comically desperate—so I did.
Advertisement
Personally I only ever used Tinder to, somewhat cruelly, troll matches to entertain friends. I had never met-up with anybody, nor considered using it for real mostly due to fear of having tell others where I had met my brand new beau. Despite having close friends that are in very successful Tinder-fostered relationships, I have been convinced they are but rare anomalies floating in a sea of very thirsty people all about the tap and gap. But what if we got it all wrong and there are a lot more souls seeking meaningful connection than casual sex? Furthermore, does anyone single genuinely buy into feeling lonely on Valentine's Day, just because it's Valentine's Day?Turns out dates are actually really easy to get. I downloaded Tinder on February 13, which only left me 24 hours to find four people (a nice, even number, I decided) willing to go out with me.I spammed maybe 50 matches, copy pasting "hey, what's up?" then immediately asked to meet up, all while pretending like I forgot it's Valentine's Day tomorrow (many were dubious about this and rightly so). At this point I decided I wouldn't tell any of my matches why I was frothing to meet-up, in order to keep the romance as authentic as possible.It's easy to gauge from their response to a casual wuu2, who was crazy and who wasn't (Mike, 28: 'crying myself to sleep, wbu?') and after some mild sweating from maintaining many separate conversations, I had organised myself four dates, over four hours, on V Day.
The Admin
Advertisement
Date One: 5-6 PM, Luke*
Date Two: 6-7 PM, Scott*
Advertisement
Scott told me I was the easiest date he's ever set-up (which made me feel bad) and that girls can sometimes be "shady", but I seem really genuine (which made me feel worse). Several times I wanted to tell him I was writing a story but I was in far too deep. When he recommended a VICE documentary the irony got too real, I left a very persistent Scott only by promising to follow up for dinner plans later in the week. He sent me a Happy Valentine's Day text, while I was waiting for my next date. Brutal.
Date Three: 7-8 PM, James*
Date Four: 8-9 PM, Joel*
Advertisement
Although he paid for my drinks (yikes) which was kind, Joel was easily the most pretentious of the three. He is not fuccboi, he assured. He is a connoisseur of coffee and craft beer, he professed. "I don't really understand RnB," he tells me in cute/fun/flirty way—which I didn't appreciate. Most of his friends were basic bros so he doesn't know why he's friends with them, he regrets. Throughout our entire interaction, I couldn't shake the feeling he was scouting a baby mama and that is terrifying.Although a hook-up culture totally exists, I realised during my many dates that my views were more a result of the 'men want sex, women want love' heteronormative ideal that we've bought into since the dawn of time, rather than any real experience.When Scott text me today asking about my day, my moral compass would neither allow me to ghost nor reply as normal, so instead I came clean.Consequently, discrediting Tinder or Valentine's Day has become so ubiquitous it's boring. It's impossible to ignore that both are cultural phenomena that successfully establish human connection. It's so easy to believe that men turn to Tinder or organise Valentine's dates just to get laid while women are desperately searching for true love, whereas in reality I don't think anyone is really giving anyone enough credit.Follow Beatrice on Instagram.