Female-Led Activist Group Wants 100 Women Elected to Congress by 2020
Image via Facebook.

FYI.

This story is over 5 years old.

Vote Now

Female-Led Activist Group Wants 100 Women Elected to Congress by 2020

Helping the women who deserve to lead gain the backing they need to win will amount to a 22-seat gain in Congress by the 100th anniversary of women's suffrage.

No taxation without representation.” Remember that from your high school history class? It was one of the galvanizing concepts of the Revolutionary War (and the slogan of the District of Columbia): we shouldn’t be paying for policies if we don’t have anyone representing us in the decision-making process. But even though, in 2018, women comprise more than 50 percent of the U.S. population, they hold only 20 percent of Congressional seats. Project 100, which aims to get 100 progressive women elected to Congress by the 100th anniversary of women’s right to vote in 2020, is looking for a radical transformation.

Advertisement

Representation is part of the equation, but not all of it.

“There’s data that when women legislate, they legislate differently,” Danielle Gram, co-founder of Project 100, told VICE Impact “They bring money back to their district, there’s more collaboration across the aisle, and a focus on issues for women and families.”

Currently, Congress is 80 percent male and 81 percent white, and the average net worth of a member of Congress is over a million dollars.

When women legislate, they legislate differently. They bring money back to their district, there’s more collaboration across the aisle, and a focus on issues for women and families.

“This means their perspective as they legislate for our country is different from the average American,” said Gram.

She and her co-founder Isabel Kaplan decided it was time for a radical change after the 2016 election.


Watch some more video on VICE:


“I grew up very into politics,” said Kaplan. “My mom was the first woman to run a presidential campaign. I knew a great deal about women in politics, and I had faith in progress.”

She was involved with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and she was one of the many blindsided by Donald Trump’s shocking victory.

“The election was a wake-up call, and it forced me to look critically at the progress I assumed was happening,” said Kaplan. “I realized we needed to do something radical. Playing nice wasn’t getting us anywhere.”

Advertisement

She contacted Gram, who could also reach back into her family vault to find a wealth of powerful women who advocated for change. Two of Gram’s great-great aunts were imprisoned during the suffragist movement of the early 20th century as they fought for equal rights.

The election was a wake-up call, and it forced me to look critically at the progress I assumed was happening,

“The more I looked into these aunts of mine, the more I was willing to make personal sacrifices,” said Gram. “These sisters were imprisoned, and went on hunger strikes.”

Betty Gram Swing was imprisoned five times and went on five hunger strikes. Her sister Alice Gram was so ill after the so-called Night of Terror -- during which women activists were imprisoned, tortured and abused while seeking the right to vote -- that she was unable to engage as intensely in subsequent years.

“I know from stories I’ve heard that when she passed away she was dismayed with how little progress we had made,” said Gram.

When Betty and Alice were fighting a century ago, there was a schism in the women’s suffrage movement. There was the old guard, which advocated for gradual, state-by-state change, and then there was the National Woman’s Party) led by Alice Paul.

“This was a new guard of radical, younger, impatient women who didn’t think state-by-state would affect change fast enough. They wanted to shake things up and move the political system faster,” explained Gram. “That’s where we are today. If you look at a simple statistical analysis of the rate at which women’s representation government has increased, it could be another 100 years before we achieve equality. Project 100 is a rallying cry from a more radical approach of how we can expedite progress in our country.”

Advertisement

It could be another 100 years before we achieve equality. Project 100 is a rallying cry from a more radical approach of how we can expedite progress in our country.

Fueled by the energy of past generations, Gram and Kaplan teamed up with technological innovators like Eduardo Ortiz, Eric Hysen, and Victor Garcia to form Project 100, which gives progressive women candidates a platform. They are non-partisan, but they also won’t support any candidate just because she’s a woman. Democrat, Independent, or Republican, her values have to align with their three main priorities: equal treatment under the law, economic opportunity, and healthy people and communities.

These values also serve as a road map for voters to find candidates whose message resonates. Through user-friendly software, Project 100 uses geolocation to help users find candidates near them, and algorithms that allow voters to search for candidates based on issues that matter to them.

Money is a major factor in the initial viability of a campaign, but Project 100 acknowledges that it’s not the only factor.

“Our trending algorithm was designed to acknowledge those candidates raising the most money,” said Kaplan, “but also those getting Twitter followers or media hits. A lack of access to capital is a major barrier keeping women out of politics, but we know it’s not just about money.”

This platform has proven critical for women, especially those running for office for the first time, like Mary Matiella, who is running for the House of Representatives in Arizona. Matiella, a daughter of migrant farm workers, is looking to be the first Latina elected to Congress in Arizona. As a political appointee under Obama and a military wife, she has been serving this country for 35 years. But as she seeks elected office for the first time, funding is a major obstacle.

Advertisement

A lack of access to capital is a major barrier keeping women out of politics, but we know it’s not just about money.

“The funding usually flows to the person people know, the people who have run before,” Matiella otld VICE Impact. “I’ve gotten a lot of encouragement, but unfortunately the money wasn’t as free-flowing.”

Project 100 helped by making Matiella more visible to interested voters across the country, who can back her for Congress even if she isn’t in their district.

“Project 100 really liked my campaign because I had ground game,” said Matiella. “I’m out canvassing, training volunteers. They help with a presence in social media, talking about who I am and why they endorsed me. They helped make it visible that I am a product of the American dream.”

When asked what our government would look like if we achieved the goal of Project 100, to elect 100 progressive women to office by 2020, Kaplan points out that at last count, there were 429 women running for office in 2018. She emphasizes that their 100-seat goal is only the beginning.

“That’s our initial target,” she said. “We won’t stop there. This is about equality. If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re probably on the menu.”

If you have a strong opinion on how the government should be run, don't just talk about it— take action. Make sure you're registered to vote so that you can have your voice heard. Then show up on Election Day in local and federal races to make your vote count. VICE Impact has partnered with TurboVote to get people registered, sign up today to have an effect on tomorrow.